Cookie settings

Choose which cookies Keepnet can use. You can change this at any time from "Cookie settings" at the bottom of every page.

Statistics and research

Phishing Simulation Benchmarks: How Does Your Organization Compare?

Phishing simulation benchmarks help organizations evaluate their security awareness and identify areas for improvement. Learn how to use these benchmarks to strengthen your defenses.

, Founder and CEO, Keepnet
Published Updated 3 min read
Phishing Simulation Benchmarks: How Does Your Organization Compare?
On this page 6 sections

Phishing simulation benchmarks should come from independent datasets, not vendor marketing. The Verizon 2026 DBIR reports median click rates of ~1.4% for email simulations and ~2% for phone-centric scenarios (~40% higher, p. 50). Use these medians to grade cohorts, not to celebrate low single-digit clicks alone.

Phishing simulation benchmarks at a glance (2026)

Table 1.DBIR 2026 simulation medians
ChannelMedian click rateUse in benchmarking
Email~1.4%Default SAT baseline
Phone / SMS / voice~2%Multi-channel programs
Gap~40% higher on phoneJustifies vishing/smishing sims

How to compare your organization

Benchmark by role and channel. Finance and help-desk cohorts often exceed company-wide medians on callback and BEC templates. Pair click data with reporting rate and time-to-report, Gartner finds 84% of organizations track completion while fewer than 10% of MSE measured breaches involve phishing (G00811878).

Why this matters

A 1.2% email click rate means little if phone sims fail at 4% and nobody reports.

What security leaders should do

Publish channel-specific medians in QBRs. Cross-check with SBCP metrics and phishing statistics 2026.

Cohort reporting benchmarks

Track repeat-failure cohorts after each campaign. Compare year-over-year medians against DBIR published sim statistics, not against arbitrary industry blog percentages.

What Better Program Design Looks Like

Phishing Simulation Benchmarks: How Does Your Organization Compare? works best when the content reflects how people actually make decisions. Strong programs do not try to teach everything at once. They focus on the few behaviors that create the most risk, then reinforce them with current examples, timely reminders, and clear reporting paths.

That is also what makes training easier to defend internally. When a program changes behavior, reduces repeat-risk patterns, or improves reporting quality, leaders can see how awareness supports real business outcomes instead of acting like a standalone compliance activity.

Keepnet teams usually see the biggest gains when training is tied to a reporting path and a follow-up workflow. For most organizations, the common mistake is treating phishing simulation benchmarks: how does your organization compare? as content delivery instead of behavior design.

Program Checklist

  • Choose the user decisions that matter most instead of covering every possible topic.
  • Use short modules, current examples, and realistic follow-up after incidents or simulations.
  • Measure reporting, repeat risk, and remediation behavior, not only completions.
  • Give managers and team leads a role in reinforcing the habits you want to build.

Sources

  1. Verizon 2026 DBIR summary
  2. Gartner G00811878, G00840741 (2025–2026).
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Benchmarks are reference rates for clicking, credential submission and reporting that let an organisation compare its results against a wider population rather than only against its own last campaign.

The median click rate for email simulations is around 1.4%, and phone centric simulations fail at roughly 40% higher rates (Verizon, 2026 Data Breach Investigations Report, 2026, p. 50).

Only with caution. Scenario difficulty, industry, audience and even how a click is counted vary between programmes, so a benchmark sets context rather than a target.

Your own trend, segmented by department and by channel. The useful question is whether reporting is rising and time to report is falling in the groups that carry the most risk.

Susceptibility by channel, reporting rate, time to report, repeat exposure, and how those move across quarters. Completion counts belong in a compliance record rather than a risk report.

Quarterly is enough to see a trend. Monthly comparison usually measures scenario variation rather than any change in behaviour.

Schedule your 30-minute demo now

You'll learn how to:

  • Implement custom phishing simulations tailored to your organization's needs.
  • Track and analyze key metrics to benchmark your organization against industry standards.
  • Develop targeted security awareness training to boost employee resilience.
Book a demo

30 minutes with a Keepnet specialist, on your own use cases.

Author

Ozan Ucar

Founder and CEO, Keepnet

Ozan founded Keepnet in 2017 and has worked in cyber security since 2006. He leads Keepnet's product direction and works with security teams on measuring and changing the behaviours behind incidents.

About Keepnet's team

ShareLinkedInX

More on statistics and research

  • Start here

    The Verizon DBIR: A Year-by-Year Research Hub

    The Keepnet hub for every year's Verizon DBIR analysis. Covers what the DBIR is, how it is built, year-by-year archive links, Keepnet's contributor relationship, and how to read the report effectively.

    6 min read

  • 2026 Verizon DBIR: Voice and SMS Phishing Decoded

    The 2026 Verizon DBIR covers 31,000+ incidents and 22,000+ confirmed breaches. For the first time, it measures voice and SMS phishing simulation results. Phone-centric simulations show a 40 percent higher click rate than email. Here's what security teams need to act on now.

    15 min read

All 14 articles on statistics and research